Appendices for “Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies: Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment”
نویسنده
چکیده
In table 1 I report mean values of selected student characteristics that are determined prior to university attendance, separately by tracking/random assignment period and by dormitory/non-dormitory status. I report p-values from testing if these means are equal across dormitory students in the tracking and random assignment periods (column 4) and across non-dormitory students in the tracking and random assignment periods (column 7). I also report pvalues in column 8 from testing if the changes in means between the tracking and random assignment periods are equal for dormitory and non-dormitory students, i.e. testing if the parallel trends assumption holds. There are differences in three of thirteen characteristics that are significant at the 10% level. However, two of these differences are due to omitting one non-randomly assigned dormitory in the random assignment period, as I discuss in section I.
منابع مشابه
Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies: Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment∗
A growing literature in the economics of education emphasizes the importance of peer effects in determining students’ academic outcomes. Most of the existing empirical literature uses natural experiments in which students are randomly assigned to peer groups to identify the causal effect of peer characteristics. However, their results provide no direct evidence regarding the policy-relevant pro...
متن کاملBad Company: Reconciling Negative Peer Effects in College Achievement∗
Existing studies of peer effects produce many contradictory findings, including positive, negative, large, and small peer effects in similar contexts. We reconcile these results using a rich dataset covering a 22-year history of the random assignment of students to peer groups at the U.S. Naval Academy. Coupled with a lack of student choice over freshman-year courses, our setting affords an opp...
متن کاملGender Peer Effects: Evidence from a Quasi-Random Classroom Assignment Policy∗
The literature on gender peer effects documents that exposure to opposite gender peers can lead to higher academic performances for boys but lower outcomes, especially in math, for girls. This result can be explained by two distinct exposure effects. One is inside-class time exposure (e.g. boy peers are disruptive and lower the quality of student-teacher interactions) and the other is outside-c...
متن کاملIdentification of peer effects with missing peer data: Evidence from Project STAR
Identification of Peer Effects with Missing Peer Data: Evidence from Project STAR This paper studies peer effects on student achievement among first graders randomly assigned to classrooms in Tennessee’s Project STAR. The analysis uses previously unexploited pre-assignment achievement measures available for 60 percent of students. Data are not missing at random, making identification challengin...
متن کاملJOB MARKET PAPER Executive Networks and Firm Policies: Evidence from the Random Assignment of MBA Peers
Using the historical random assignment of MBA students to sections at Harvard Business School, I show that executive peer networks are important determinants of managerial decisionmaking and firm policies. Within a class, executive compensation and acquisitions strategy are significantly more similar among graduates from the same section than among graduates from different sections. Both execut...
متن کامل